Tag Archive | "Nomination Day"

S’poreans react to new PAP candidates Chee Hong Tat & Chong Kee Hiong fighting over the mic in public

S’poreans react to new PAP candidates Chee Hong Tat & Chong Kee Hiong fighting over the mic in public

Tags: , , , , ,


Three thoughts that must have went past your mind at some point.

Chee Hong Tat and Chong Kee Hiong, two first-timer PAP candidates for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, were seen fighting over the mic during Nomination Day on Sept. 1, 2015, at the Raffles Institution nomination centre.

chee-hong-tat-fight-mic

Here are three thoughts Singaporeans have:

 

sian-half-auntie “It is always nice to see PAP politicians acting their age.”
Jin Yew Zi, 46-year-old psychologist

 

sian-half-uncle “I can’t wait to see how it looks like when they fight over wealth.”
Qiong Guan Dan, 63-year-old bankrupt

 

happy-bird-girl “And we wonder why local women want to date and marry foreign spouse.”
Jin Chee Pai, 18-year-old night club manager

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 











Voters tell PAP: ‘We improved your lives, helped increase your salary from few thousand to few million a year’

Voters tell PAP: ‘We improved your lives, helped increase your salary from few thousand to few million a year’

Tags: , ,


It was us who gave you the good life, not vice versa.

ng-eng-hen-nomination-jeer

Singaporeans from all walks of life, who believe it is good to say it as it is, have told PAP that it is voters who helped increased the politicians’ salaries from a few thousand to few million dollars a year.

This after Ng Eng Hen said on Sept. 1 Nomination Day to opposition supporters: “Year by year, we will improve your lives, even if you jeer against us, we will improve your lives.”

He continued: “And the more you jeer, the more we will continue to improve it even more.”

One Singaporean voter, Fan Dui Tang, said: “Year by year, we have improved your lives, even if you jeer against me, I will improve your life.”

“And the more you jeer, the more I will continue to improve it even more.”

“You need to remember that even though you improved our lives by a bit, we have improved yours by a far lot more in comparison.”

“This is because we helped increase your salary from a few thousand to a few million dollars a year.”

At press time, other Singaporeans said it is good for the PAP to remember who they are serving and where their high salaries come from.

 

 

 

 

 











Finance minister and Singapore Democratic Party come out winners in political debate

Finance minister and Singapore Democratic Party come out winners in political debate

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Worker’s Party played it safe, Lina fumbled, and what’s-his-name was plain horrible. And yes, the moderator said “Domination Day” instead of “Nomination Day.”

By Terence Lee

BEWARE, the gods may not be smiling on certain opposition parties this General Election, especially if the slip-up by moderator Melissa Hyak towards the end of the one-hour debate is any indication.

Some conspiracy theorists will insist that this was a deliberate attempt to “prove” the show was uncut, but let’s not go there.

The debate, screened on Saturday on Channel NewsAsia, lasted an hour, which was way too short for me. Candidates rattled off their points quickly, racing one another in a sprint to the finish line. It makes for fun TV, but a good substantive debate? I don’t think so.

But in all honesty, I think the extra time might actually hurt some of the opposition reps. Mohamed Nazem Suki, assistant secretary-general of the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), was a total embarrassment.

Unable to string together even a coherent sentence or two, you wonder how is what’s-his-name going to perform at the Rally or in Parliament, if he does get in by the slimmest chance?

Right now, I can’t even recall a single thing he said, and if I am a young voter getting introduced to the SDA for the first time, that’s a bad first impression.

Let’s hope he speaks better Malay.

Lina Chiam of the Singapore People’s Party emerged slightly better-off. The bad news is: She behaved like a slightly older Tin Pei Ling, the 27-year-old rookie PAP politician poked fun by netizens for her youthful exuberance.

Except that Pei Ling had more style, fashion-wise.

She often giggled nervously and sounded unsure, and there was even once where she appeared confused and zoned out. Melissa had to prompt her twice or thrice about the question of foreign workers before she rattled off a semi-coherent answer.

And God forbid, she attributed the quote “power corrupts absolutely” to her husband. Epic fail there.

To be fair to Lina: She did say some good things. But she needs a lot of polishing up if she wants to convince voters in Potong Pasir that she is a credible candidate.

Member-of-Parliament Josephine Teo comes across as being too… nice. While she has sure knowledge of the facts, she sounded like she was there to back Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam instead of standing on her own two feet.

Although she did okay at the beginning, she wasted her last two minutes of airtime going on a self-indulgent, off-topic ramble about the Singapore Story, and how it is co-authored by many people. Vincent Wijeysingha, assistant treasurer of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), questioned her assertion later on, remarking on how scores of opposition figures and activists were silenced unfairly.

As long as Vincent and Danny the Democratic Bear continue their outreach during the elections and after, I think SDP’s chances at the voting booth in this Election and the next will improve.

In a nutshell, Josephine might’ve been slaughtered if Tharman was not there.

On to Gerald Giam, a potential candidate for the Worker’s Party. True to form, he sounded like a foot soldier espousing the mantra of his party, starting every sentence with “The Worker’s Party believes that…”

I don’t think it’s awful; it’s just too safe. Which is what the Worker’s Party has become since Low Thia Khiang took the helm. Although he was calm and confident at the debate, much like Josephine, he could have spent more time talking about his party’s proposals on policy issues.

No doubt, he was right in saying that good Opposition is necessary in Parliament, but he seemed to have fallen back on that again and again, as if he had nothing else to say. Furthermore, he did not press home the point that despite having 33 percent of the votes, the Opposition only has three seats in Parliament.

I was also a bit surprised that he stopped his final ramble at the one-minute mark. Perhaps he felt he has done his job: Present Worker’s Party as a safe choice for voters. And by the way: We’re weaker than the People’s Action Party, we admit it.

Finally, we come to Tharman and Vincent. If I am the CEO of MediaCorp, I would allocate another one hour-show just for the two to slug it out, seriously.

While Vincent was the assertive bulldog raring for a fight, Tharman was the self-assured minister who appeared comfortable but not overbearing. He displayed some subtle command over the other candidates, exhorting everyone to think in Singapore’s best interest when it came to the issue of foreign workers. He reached out across the table to Gerald at times, praising the Worker’s Party for their views on increasing productivity.

He did not address criticisms about ministerial salary and legal prosecution of Opposition members, but I’m not sure if it matters to most viewers. For the politically-disinclined, these things might just pass over their heads.

But Vincent will be the one to watch. He sounded eloquent and quick-witted. He was enthusiastic, and even promoted SDP’s Shadow Budget while criticising the mainstream media, all at the same time.

He even found time to raise the issue of exorbitant ministerial salaries at least twice, but the PAP reps have totally ignored that.

Sure, the SDP cried foul over how the debate was unfair because candidates who are not contesting are not allowed to speak. This meant that Dr Chee Soon Juan, who declared bankrupt, cannot appear at the forum.

But surely they realise that putting a fresh face on television will take the party one step closer towards rehabilitating their image in the eyes of the populace, especially how Soon Juan has been demonised by the media?

As long as Vincent and Danny the Democratic Bear continue their outreach during the elections and after, I think SDP’s chances at the voting booth in this Election and the next will improve.

For a summary of the key debates, click here.