Tag Archive | "family"

Homosexuals in S’pore regretting boycott, hard-pressed to find another furniture retailer as affordable as IKEA

Homosexuals in S’pore regretting boycott, hard-pressed to find another furniture retailer as affordable as IKEA

Tags: , , , , ,


Where else can they get a cabinet for S$39 or meatballs with mystery brown sauce?

ikea-singapore-tampines

Homosexuals in Singapore from all walks of life, who are boycotting IKEA for supporting an upcoming July performance by a local gay-bashing magician, are finding themselves in a quagmire.

They are regretting their decision to boycott the mega furniture store as they are now hard-pressed to find another retailer that is as convenient and can compete with a wide variety of affordable goods that appeal to their aesthetic taste.

Tong Xing Lian, a local gay man, said: “I disagree with IKEA Singapore’s support for that Lawrence Khong magician, who only know how to perform tricks, but I am also finding it hard not to go there to buy something.”

“Saying I am boycotting IKEA is effectively saying I am never going to buy furniture ever again.”

Non-homosexual Singaporeans from all walks of life said boycotting IKEA is easier said than done as it would mean saying goodbye to the signature meatballs with mystery brown sauce, a dish that will soon be recognised as a Singapore delicacy at the rate we are consuming those balls.

One local non-homosexual person, Yi Xing Lian, said: “Good luck trying not to eat at the biggest cafeteria in Singapore.”

At press time, the furniture retailer is reviewing its support for the magic show and reiterated it is committed to diversity worldwide, like how they have a diverse range of furniture designs.

 

The gay agenda in Singapore:

Apple CEO confesses he’s gay, causes crisis in FCBC and FotF as many members are iPhone users

Conservative S’poreans demand S’pore Zoo investigate if they possess gay animals

Thanks, Lawrence Khong, for standing up to the gay agenda

Letter writer: NUS Students’ Political Association is promoting human-animal relations

Letter writer: NUS Students’ Political Association is promoting human-animal relations

Tags: , ,


We need to ban this event and arrest the liberal agitators, letter writer says.

nuspa-family-forum-baey-yam-keng-cropped

Dear New Nation,

I am horrified to learn that the National University of Singapore Students’ Political Association is promoting human-animal relations under the guise of Family policy discussion.

I was browsing this website called The Facebook the other day and saw that there will be a NUS forum on March 19, 2015 featuring Tampines MP Baey Yam Keng, AWARE’s Jolene Tan and Leow Yangfa from Oogachaga as speakers.

For publicity, NUSPA has put up an image that shows the silhouette of a woman and a dog raising a boy, as well as a boy raising two women and a woman and a man with unnaturally elongated arms that touch the floor that don’t resemble anyone I know of personally.

I have two issues with these details so far.

One, I am disturbed that NUS does not subscribe to social norms and mores by advocating for a one-man-one-woman nuclear family unit but has allowed other kinds of discussions to go on and infect mainstream consciousness with bastardised ideas of what a family unit can be.

As if homosexual coupling isn’t bad enough, we now have human-animal relations as well?

Look, I also have someone on The Facebook agreeing with this sentiment:

nuspa-comments-03

Two, why are all the speakers from pro-LGBT groups?

In Singapore today, we can find many men dressed as women and wearing tight-fitting clothes like this:

baey-vietname

This is not right. We need normal people like pious upright Singaporean Thio Su Mien to stand up for normal Singaporeans. Why wasn’t she on the speaker line-up?

However, it is still not too late.

As a religious person with a big heart, I am willing to forgive NUS and the political association, as well as all the speakers, for their individual and collective wrongdoing, if they turn themselves in to the police station now to be apprehended for their senseless thoughts.

Or else, I’d be made to take drastic action like call on my MP to tell the ISD to arrest all these liberal agitators.

I know I am not alone in this. Someone else on The Facebook also shares this sentiments:

nuspa-comments-05-cropped

Yours truly,
Conservative Nazi

 

Letters from straight and normal Singaporeans:

Reader forgives government for maligning City Harvest Church

Letter writer: Ban Adam Lambert from performing

Abercrombie & Fitch promoting homosexuality, exhibitionism in Singapore

Respect to Pastor Lawrence Khong for casting adulteress aside

Letter writer: Magician Lawrence Khong’s agenda goes against our national interest

Letter writer: Magician Lawrence Khong’s agenda goes against our national interest

Tags: , , , ,


If we keep up with this idea of a traditional family, we will go back to a time where man had many wives.

lawrence-khong-magic

Dear New Nation,

I find it totally confounding that the magician Lawrence Khong is allowed to promote his agenda.

I find it more disconcerting that he is using the media and Pink Dot as a platform of public persuasion to push his SM-esque, magic-performing lifestyle.

This is no good for Singapore, because it encourages people to believe in magic instead of working hard. So, why is our media and government giving him the public space to push his agenda and grow his movement?

Lawrence Khong has worked in all sectors, all over the economy, in sports and in entertainment and in community service as well. He is free to lead his life, free to pursue his social activities.

But there are restraints and we should not approve of him actively putting out statements and promoting his lifestyle to others, or setting the tone for mainstream society.

I would like to see a clear line drawn on where to stand regarding this moral issue.

He will not stop at keeping 377A. He will push for more. Ultimately he will want to redefine Love, Marriage and Family. That’s why he puts them in capital letters.

He is trying to change them and use them in a way that normal people don’t. He has not publicly declared it, but it looks like his objective is to change society’s attitude.

Is this the kind of Singapore we can be proud of and want for our children? I feel sad at the thought of Singapore in moral regression.

In the past decades or more, our leaders have made considerable effort to alter the idea of the Family Institution as the basic and foundational building block to nation-building.

From limiting the number of children in a family, to engineering the socio-economic statuses of couples, to trying to increase family sizes, to redefining family as not just one man, one woman and two children, but one man, one woman, three or more children, the man’s parents, the woman’s parents, his and her siblings, and so on. Why should the government stop now?

Lawrence Khong’s agenda goes against our national interests. If he is allowed to continue, the day will come when he brings us back to the days of our forefathers, the days we have worked so hard to move away from.

We will go from First world to Third, to a world where the basic family unit is defined as one man to many wives and tens of children and girls were not allowed to go to school and policemen wore shorts, and where there was no Lawrence Khong.

The day our founding fathers can recognise the Singapore we have worked for so long on, is the day we know we are still stuck in the 1800s.

Best,
New Nation reader