Tag Archive | "death penalty"

S’poreans must try death penalty before being for or against it

S’poreans must try death penalty before being for or against it

Tags:


If not how would they know if it is any good or bad?

changi-prison-inmates

More Singaporeans from all walks of life, who believe in giving things a chance, are giving death penalty a try.

This after they felt they cannot judge whether the death penalty is good or bad unless they tried it for themselves personally.

One Singaporean, Qi Kwa Mai, said: “My grandmother used to say, ‘How you know the spinach not nice? You got try? You try first. Everything must try one time.'”

“I think this is good advice. You won’t know until you try it.”

Other locals said giving the opportunity for all to try out the death penalty once should be written into law.

Another local, Shi Yi Xia, said: “A lot of people arguing for or against something are doing so while relying only on pure instinct and ill-informed personal experiences.”

“If you want to be against abortion, you must give it a try first before vouching against it.”

“If you want to be against same-sex marriage, you should get into a union with a person of the same sex and try it out for a few months at least before making an informed judgement, listing out clearly the pros and cons.”

“These days people are too quick to jump to conclusions.”

At press time, more Singaporeans are for corruption after they’ve tried it.

 

 

 

 

 

 





Prisoners opt for death penalty if Sun Ho were to replace Serina Wee in jail

Prisoners opt for death penalty if Sun Ho were to replace Serina Wee in jail

Tags: ,


They simply cannot accept this sort of cruel punishment.

sun-ho-jail-iinstead

Thousands of prisoners from all walks of life currently locked up in jail in Singapore, have handwritten and submitted appeals to pass sentences on themselves retroactively calling for the death penalty to be applied to them en masse.

This after they got wind of the appeal filed by Singaporeans collectively calling for Sun Ho to take over Serina Wee’s jail sentence.

Some prisoners started out in their appeal by reasoning that it is unfair for them to be locked up with Sun Ho.

One prisoner, Fan Fa, who wrote a note pleading for leniency, said: “We inmates are already paying for our crimes by being incarcerated in prison. We do not see the need to be further locked up in the same premises as Sun Ho.”

When they realised this might not sway the decision-makers, many changed tact and accused the move to let Sun Ho take over Serina Wee in prison to be a violation of basic human rights.

One other prisoner, Zuo Lao, wrote: “Being locked up in the same cell with Sun Ho constitutes as a cruel and unusual punishment and will be a human rights violation of the grossest magnitude.”

“As prisoners, we have been locked up with the understanding that we will be treated with some basic dignity. Not this.”

However, if all else fails, the prisoners are mentally prepared to take necessary action.

See Leow, another inamte, wrote: “Death is preferable.”

“If a call for leniency is ignored and the calling out of human rights abuses is not heeded, we will have no choice but to choose to be put to death.”

“We shall opt for the death penalty to be applied to us, as this shall be the last resort and the only form of escape.”

At press time, prisoners hoping that Serina Wee will still be the one going to prison have written in favour of extending their imprisonment.

 

 

 

 

 

 





S’poreans give death penalty a try before being for or against it

S’poreans give death penalty a try before being for or against it

Tags:


If not how would they know if it is any good or bad?

changi-prison-inmates

More Singaporeans from all walks of life, who believe in giving things a chance, are giving death penalty a try.

This after they felt they cannot judge whether the death penalty is good or bad unless they tried it for themselves personally.

One Singaporean, Qi Kwa Mai, said: “My grandmother used to say, ‘How you know the spinach not nice? You got try? You try first. Everything must try one time.'”

“I think this is good advice. You won’t know until you try it.”

Other locals said giving the opportunity for all to try out the death penalty once should be written into law.

Another local, Shi Yi Xia, said: “A lot of people arguing for or against something are doing so while relying only on pure instinct and ill-informed personal experiences.”

“If you want to be against abortion, you must give it a try first before vouching against it.”

“If you want to be against same-sex marriage, you should get into a union with a person of the same sex and try it out for a few months at least before making an informed judgement, listing out clearly the pros and cons.”

“These days people are too quick to jump to conclusions.”

At press time, more Singaporeans are for corruption after they’ve tried it.

 

 

 

 

 

 





S’pore awash with drugs after death penalty got cancelled

S’pore awash with drugs after death penalty got cancelled

Tags: ,


Peddlers out in full force, recruitment drive going on for more pushers.

Drugs all over the place. Photo stolen from here: http://mymom987.deviantart.com/art/Hypodermic-needle-151681217

Drugs all over the place.
Photo stolen from here.

Singapore is awash with drugs after the death penalty got cancelled in dramatic fashion two days ago.

A drug peddler, who was sitting on a four-year death row was miraculously spared, making it good news for drug kingpins who are emboldened to find new ways to market and franchise their goods.

Hai Luo Yin, a local said: “I was buying Hokkien Mee this morning and the auntie was pushing meth.”

Besides targeting adults, children are also zoomed in on.

Mai Wan Ju, another Singaporean said: “Toys R Us has a section selling toy replicas for shooting up heroin.”

To make drugs even more widely available, discount vouchers for purchasing drugs are now bundled as part of credit card sign ups.

Drugs are also used as house warming presents and solemnisation gifts.

Pao Pao Cha, another Singaporean said: “Crack cocaine is now more ubiquitous than Gong Cha.”

 

 

 

 

Outraged citizens demand death penalty for war memorial vandal

Outraged citizens demand death penalty for war memorial vandal

Tags: , , ,


Public amputation followed by hanging preferred.

cenotaph

The vandalism of the war memorial at Esplanade Park three days ago has outraged citizens so much so that they are demanding the death penalty for the vandal, if he ever gets caught.

The war memorial — called the Cenotaph and located along Connaught Drive — is one of those forgotten pieces of stuff in Singapore that nobody notices until it got vandalised and suddenly became important again.

It commemorates the sacrifice of men who perished during World War I and II.

Women are not included.

Citizens interviewed by New Nation have expressed their outrage and said that they want the vandal arrested, trialed and sentenced as soon as possible.

But at the same time, precaution must be taken to videotape the entire process of investigation, detention, questioning and incarceration to prevent allegations of police brutality.

Hor Yi Si, a Singaporean man, said: “On the day of sentencing, I want the vandal’s hands amputated in public before he is hanged from the neck to death.”

“After that, his body shall be broken on the wheel and displayed on the four corners of the island.”

This is to deter other vandals and street artists from defacing public property, other citizens echoed, as well as serve a fair warning to Somali pirates.

However, tour agents said that the vandalism is a timely reminder that the Cenotaph has been there all along.

Lai Jiak Hong, a tour agent, said: “This has been free publicity for the war memorial the past three days. Rarely anyone even remembers what it is for, let alone something to be vandalised.”

Still safe to read, no ban on Alan Shadrake’s book – yet

Still safe to read, no ban on Alan Shadrake’s book – yet

Tags: , , , ,


Alan Shadrake’s book Once A Jolly Hangman is not as bad and scary as the authorities make it out to be. I know, because it hasn’t been banned.

By Belmont Lay

SINGAPORE has a habit of banning stuff it vehemently disagrees with.

Over the years, we’ve banned chewing gum, guns, drugs, contraband cigarettes, public nudity, graffitti, pornography, moonshine, euthanasia, Martin Scorsese’s The Last Temptation of Christ, public gatherings of four persons or more, secret societies, Janet Jackson’s Velvet Rope and All For You albums, Malaysian newspapers from circulation here, satellite dishes and recently, face-painting plus drum-banging during Thaipusam…

Ok, deep breath. The list is long and I could go on.

Therefore, I will.

We have also banned public protests, whores from soliciting openly, all trade unions except for one, knuckle dusters, Puff, the Magic Dragon, independent newspapers, Dustin Lance Black’s 2009 Academy Awards acceptance speech, men with long hair from entering government buildings, Mr Brown from print newspaper, walking around with a political party logo on Polling Day, Sex and The City, Cosmopolitan magazine, Singlish from free-to-air, local play Human Lefts, Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses and not to mention, Led Zeppelin’s Stairway to Heaven, which has been prohibited from being played over our airwaves for the longest time. (That hasn’t deterred me from playing it at home often enough at Krakatoan levels until I’m convinced my parents are capable of singing the first stanza whenever they hear the A – C – E – A arpeggio.)

But here’s one thing Singapore hasn’t banned: Veteran British writer Alan Shadrake’s book, Once A Jolly Hangman: Singapore’s Justice in the Docks.

Now, look, this is where I’m confused.

Chewing gum causes MRT train doors to be jammed open or shut leaving a sticky trail and can be a public nuisance, so therefore, it has to go.

Dustin Lance Black’s 81st Academy Awards acceptance speech might make nuns blush, so you know, it really is, well… erm. Therefore, it has to go too.

Drinking moonshine can make you mad and that is a scientific fact.

And what could be worse than all these three instances?

Last October, Justice Quentin Loh ruled in Shadrake’s trial that his book, which was primarily about the death penalty, could cause readers to lose faith in Singapore’s justice system.

This was because the book implied judges were “influenced by political and economic situations and are biased against the weak and the poor.”

That’s a pretty serious charge, isn’t it?

Shadrake, who wrote mainly about cases involving the death penalty and his interview with Singapore’s ex-hangman Darshan Singh in 2004, was subsequently convicted for “scandalising Singapore’s judiciary” and sentenced to six weeks in jail plus a $20,000 fine.

And if he can’t cough up the money, sorry pal, it’s another two more weeks of free accommodation.

That’s a pretty serious penalty too, isn’t it?

Shadrake, who is 76-going-on-77, appealed. He’s represented by M Ravi, who is the only remaining human rights advocate-lawyer in Singapore.

So, on Monday this week, after more than five months of waiting since sentencing, I showed up at the Court of Appeal anticipating the outcome.

But there was none. Apparently, after two hours of interminable legal jargon that left everyone for dead plus a heavy-burdened bladder, the judges reserved judgement and court was adjourned.

Which means, on top of rigor mortis and the urgency to pee, we are left with a whole lot more of head-scratching and shoulder-shrugging.

Shadrake didn’t even come close to what criminal lawyer Subhas Anandan wrote explicitly when he gave a damning indictment of the criminal justice system.

“So when will we know the outcome?” Not too sure.

“What about the investigation supposedly stemming from charges of criminal defamation?” No one knows, really. (Ravi thinks it is over. Shadrake thinks it’s not.)

“So did you actually violate the Official Secrets Act?” Your guess is as good as mine, man.

“After all these your book is technically not banned?” Hell yeah!

But as always, I have the happy solution: Since the whole deal is done with in court, and the appeal court judges can’t seem to decide, why not ask a layperson for an opinion?

How about me? I’ve read the book. I’ve even got it autographed. I’m a member of the public. I’m perfectly qualified to speak about how I feel about the book’s contents. It’s also my perception that the courts are interested in, no?

All I can say is:

Get.

A.

Life.

Shadrake didn’t even come close to what criminal lawyer Subhas Anandan wrote explicitly when he gave a damning indictment of the criminal justice system.

Check out what Subhas had to say about criminal law in Singapore on page 87 of his autobiography, The Best I Could: “Though there is a “presumption of innocence”, according to our Constitution, the man in the street cannot be blamed if he thinks that he has to prove his innocence in court. The law is lopsided. So many aspects of the criminal law are loaded against the accused. The Constitution says one thing but in practice, it’s different.”

How the hell should this be perceived as not as damaging as what Shadrake wrote about? The last time I checked, The Best I Could was still available on the shelves.

And another point: I surely didn’t read Once A Jolly Hangman and come to the same conclusions as Justice Loh.

My take is that the main patch of grass Shadrake’s book seems to be plowing on is as old as the Greeks: When the ancient Scythian philosopher Anacharsis said that laws are like cobwebs, he meant that they are strong enough to only detain the weak, and too weak to hold the strong.

And how is this thought by Anacharsis unlike what I quoted Subhas as saying that criminal law has a lopsided quality this side of the world now?

So, here’s the point of today’s missive: If the Court of Appeal were to uphold Shadrake’s conviction, it might just vindicate Anacharsis.

And this might just prompt another writer somewhere, sometime in the future to write a book about how the laws are like cobwebs again.

And then that author will face the same predicament.

Ipso facto, it will continue forevermore.

The sun will implode, turn into a blackhole and an event horizon will emerge on its edge. And you and I will become chopped liver.

And Stephen Hawking will be vindicated.

Too.

And how is propounding this bit of astrophysical theory by a man who could not hold a pen to write down a thought or mathematical equation in the last 30 years due to Lou Gehrig’s disease be not as bad and scary as everything else Singapore has ever banned?

Want to have the blogosphere in your pocket? New Nation has an app for that. Available on the Android Marketplace.

Trending Videos