Tag Archive | "Channel NewsAsia"

CNA reports on The Noose’s Emmy nomination… after everyone else did

CNA reports on The Noose’s Emmy nomination… after everyone else did

Tags: , ,

The Singapore news channel now has a new reputation — that of a slow poke.

By Terence Lee

Like, seriously?

Channel NewsAsia (CNA) is known as one of the best news channels in Asia, beating the likes of Korean Central Television and China Central Television (CCTV).

With its sharp eye for news and penetrating investigative journalism, the Singapore news channel has been scoring award after award like nobody’s business. Read the full story

Finance minister and Singapore Democratic Party come out winners in political debate

Finance minister and Singapore Democratic Party come out winners in political debate

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Worker’s Party played it safe, Lina fumbled, and what’s-his-name was plain horrible. And yes, the moderator said “Domination Day” instead of “Nomination Day.”

By Terence Lee

BEWARE, the gods may not be smiling on certain opposition parties this General Election, especially if the slip-up by moderator Melissa Hyak towards the end of the one-hour debate is any indication.

Some conspiracy theorists will insist that this was a deliberate attempt to “prove” the show was uncut, but let’s not go there.

The debate, screened on Saturday on Channel NewsAsia, lasted an hour, which was way too short for me. Candidates rattled off their points quickly, racing one another in a sprint to the finish line. It makes for fun TV, but a good substantive debate? I don’t think so.

But in all honesty, I think the extra time might actually hurt some of the opposition reps. Mohamed Nazem Suki, assistant secretary-general of the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), was a total embarrassment.

Unable to string together even a coherent sentence or two, you wonder how is what’s-his-name going to perform at the Rally or in Parliament, if he does get in by the slimmest chance?

Right now, I can’t even recall a single thing he said, and if I am a young voter getting introduced to the SDA for the first time, that’s a bad first impression.

Let’s hope he speaks better Malay.

Lina Chiam of the Singapore People’s Party emerged slightly better-off. The bad news is: She behaved like a slightly older Tin Pei Ling, the 27-year-old rookie PAP politician poked fun by netizens for her youthful exuberance.

Except that Pei Ling had more style, fashion-wise.

She often giggled nervously and sounded unsure, and there was even once where she appeared confused and zoned out. Melissa had to prompt her twice or thrice about the question of foreign workers before she rattled off a semi-coherent answer.

And God forbid, she attributed the quote “power corrupts absolutely” to her husband. Epic fail there.

To be fair to Lina: She did say some good things. But she needs a lot of polishing up if she wants to convince voters in Potong Pasir that she is a credible candidate.

Member-of-Parliament Josephine Teo comes across as being too… nice. While she has sure knowledge of the facts, she sounded like she was there to back Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam instead of standing on her own two feet.

Although she did okay at the beginning, she wasted her last two minutes of airtime going on a self-indulgent, off-topic ramble about the Singapore Story, and how it is co-authored by many people. Vincent Wijeysingha, assistant treasurer of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), questioned her assertion later on, remarking on how scores of opposition figures and activists were silenced unfairly.

As long as Vincent and Danny the Democratic Bear continue their outreach during the elections and after, I think SDP’s chances at the voting booth in this Election and the next will improve.

In a nutshell, Josephine might’ve been slaughtered if Tharman was not there.

On to Gerald Giam, a potential candidate for the Worker’s Party. True to form, he sounded like a foot soldier espousing the mantra of his party, starting every sentence with “The Worker’s Party believes that…”

I don’t think it’s awful; it’s just too safe. Which is what the Worker’s Party has become since Low Thia Khiang took the helm. Although he was calm and confident at the debate, much like Josephine, he could have spent more time talking about his party’s proposals on policy issues.

No doubt, he was right in saying that good Opposition is necessary in Parliament, but he seemed to have fallen back on that again and again, as if he had nothing else to say. Furthermore, he did not press home the point that despite having 33 percent of the votes, the Opposition only has three seats in Parliament.

I was also a bit surprised that he stopped his final ramble at the one-minute mark. Perhaps he felt he has done his job: Present Worker’s Party as a safe choice for voters. And by the way: We’re weaker than the People’s Action Party, we admit it.

Finally, we come to Tharman and Vincent. If I am the CEO of MediaCorp, I would allocate another one hour-show just for the two to slug it out, seriously.

While Vincent was the assertive bulldog raring for a fight, Tharman was the self-assured minister who appeared comfortable but not overbearing. He displayed some subtle command over the other candidates, exhorting everyone to think in Singapore’s best interest when it came to the issue of foreign workers. He reached out across the table to Gerald at times, praising the Worker’s Party for their views on increasing productivity.

He did not address criticisms about ministerial salary and legal prosecution of Opposition members, but I’m not sure if it matters to most viewers. For the politically-disinclined, these things might just pass over their heads.

But Vincent will be the one to watch. He sounded eloquent and quick-witted. He was enthusiastic, and even promoted SDP’s Shadow Budget while criticising the mainstream media, all at the same time.

He even found time to raise the issue of exorbitant ministerial salaries at least twice, but the PAP reps have totally ignored that.

Sure, the SDP cried foul over how the debate was unfair because candidates who are not contesting are not allowed to speak. This meant that Dr Chee Soon Juan, who declared bankrupt, cannot appear at the forum.

But surely they realise that putting a fresh face on television will take the party one step closer towards rehabilitating their image in the eyes of the populace, especially how Soon Juan has been demonised by the media?

As long as Vincent and Danny the Democratic Bear continue their outreach during the elections and after, I think SDP’s chances at the voting booth in this Election and the next will improve.

For a summary of the key debates, click here.

CNA profiteering from Japan earthquake? Nothing new there

CNA profiteering from Japan earthquake? Nothing new there

Tags: , , ,

The letter from the marketing department may be insensitive, but it reveals the dark side of the media that has been around forever, says Terence Lee.

Vehicles ready for shipping being carried by a tsunami tidal wave at Hitachinaka city in Ibaraki. Photo: AP

OVERNIGHT, Channel NewsAsia (CNA) has become the new public enemy number one, beating Al Qaeda and President Nathan, who just received a fat pay raise.

All over Facebook, Singaporeans reacted in horror when a gleeful email by the CNA marketing department calling for advertising inquiries for its coverage of the earthquake was leaked.

“Call our advertising rep now!” sounding like just another sales pitch.

Former MediaCorp CEO Lucas Chow must be glad that he’s not in the middle of this unfolding tragi-comedy. Websites like Mr Brown, The Online Citizen, and yes, New Nation are quick to pounce on this unfortunate letter, and I’m guessing Straits Times journalists will, too (some already have).

But did CNA really commit an ethical misstep?

Let us establish what is clear: The way the letter is phrased sounds disturbing. There is a lack of appreciation for the fact that this is a major earthquake that has claimed hundreds of lives and caused significant infrastructural damage.

We may also question CNA’s decision to display advertisements in its coverage of the disaster. I was told that several notable news channels remove all advertisement breaks when reporting breaking news.

But it is hard to decide where to draw the line.

Ever since the advertisement revenue model for the media became standard practice, news outlets have been profiteering from all sorts of misfortune: murders, suicides, earthquakes, and sex scandals.

Honestly, were you ever angry at Channel NewsAsia when it displayed advertisements for its coverage of Jack Neo’s sex scandal? Is one’s misfortune any less than that of a thousand’s?

That is the dark side of the media that journalists have concealed so well. In fact, we can argue that the only mistake the marcomm guy at MediaCorp made was breaking the unspoken rule of being too honest. Journalists are known to crack the most unsavoury jokes about the crimes they cover. Are they sadistic? Or is that merely a psychological mechanism to deal with the trauma they face at work? What about war correspondents, some of whom enjoy the adrenaline of covering conflict, and get paid for it?

Let’s assume we live in a world where it is absolutely wrong for media outlets to profiteer from disaster coverage. Credible newspapers all around the world would be guilty as charged. Prominent news wires like Reuters and Associated Press would not escape, because they sell bad news to the newspapers.

So here’s the inescapable truth: For decades, journalists have been taught that bad news sells. The bigger the natural disaster, the more readership will rise. 10,000 deaths is always better than 10. And readers have succumbed to this journalistic logic, paying 80 cents to read about the latest casualty count.

All along, we have always taken sadistic pleasure from the misfortune of others. So if you want to be angry, get mad at the entire media ecosystem: From the advertisers to the media outlets and yes, the viewers.

No demand, no supply, right?